Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheels of Fortune (film) (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wheels of Fortune (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and a general lack of notability. Fails the guidelines set at MOS:FILM. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Nominator is the article's creator and voted to 'Keep' in both of the previous nominations. I'm desperately confused as to why they changed their mind. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 03:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment – Nominator has seemingly had a change of heart about quite a few articles they've created, blanking the pages and creating redirects without discussing it on the talk page or at AfD. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 04:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing. I made a lot of articles when I did not know anything about Wikipedia's policies. After editing for over a year, I realize that I have created a number of pages that fail WP:NF and WP:GNG. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.