Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whaley Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whaley Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY. Significant coverage not found. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 07:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even the sources mentioned in the article don't contain the company's name. I couldn't find any other reliable source covering the company significantly. Fails GNG/ORG. Lourdes 15:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, spammy article for a subject not widely covered by anyone not financially connected to it. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Small firm which apparently hasn't yet released anything. Article seems promotional. 06:44, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete Corporate spam, no indications of notability, fails GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.