Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weekly Blitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Salah Choudhury. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Weekly Blitz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Weekly Blitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:WEB or WP:GNG. Arunudoy (Arunudoy)-- 10:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

• Keep The article has problems, but multiple stories in The Australian, The Wall Street Journal, and The Jerusalem Post make it difficult to argue that the Weekly Blitz doesn't meet WP:GNG, that it hasn't gained significant attention by the world at large. One could debate how much is about the founder and editor, and how much about his controversial tabloid newspaper - the raiding, bombing, and mobbing of its offices - but that would not support deletion, only, at worst, merging.

There is also evidence that the newspaper meets the fourth point of the applicable section of Wikipedia:Notability (media). Examples of being cited by other reliable sources include: [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Keep and improve. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

• The articles that I was able to access hardly said anything about the Weekly Blitz and instead discussed its founder, Choudhury. Therefore I conclude that it fails WP:NORG and recommend a merge to his article. (t · c) buidhe 09:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still disagreement whether the RS presented meets GNG
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 19:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

• Merge To the Choudhury article. It seems notable enough of a subject for a mention somewhere, but not enough for it's own article. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.