Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Chongwei (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Chongwei[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN hockey player, fails NHOCKEY as never having played in a league or at a level recognized by the guideline as notable. No evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 00:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete contrary to what was said in the previous discussion, not all "national teams" default grant notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Created by an editor with a history of dubious ice hockey-related article creations and for players competing on national teams that play far below the top pool at the Worlds/Olympics, the only level for which NHOCKEY accords presumptive notability. – AaronWikia (talk) 01:24, 02 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG and fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 17:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What, exactly, has changed since the last AfD to swing the pendulum the other way? @Johnpacklambert, AaronWikia, and Djsasso czar 07:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.