Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivekananda College, Thakurpukur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vivekananda College, Thakurpukur[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see coverage in independent sources. The source present are also not accessible. It may nor fulfill WP:GNG. Heba Aisha (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: As per WP:UNIN, all colleges are de facto notable. We can also use college website to improve the article. -AppuduPappudu (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article lacks any coverage that would pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Listings, namesakes and related pages. No independent reliable sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 18:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article does not have SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth to meet GNG or ORGCRIT. Sources in the article are either from the school or are database style entries. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV. AppuduPappudu you should study WP:IS, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:N. Nothing is notable unless there are sources that demonstrate notability. Editors can presume notability, but this is not a guarantee a subject is notability and may be and often is challenged. // Timothy :: talk 05:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution, which consensus has been to keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sourcing that is available is extremely poor. Plus there is no way the article can be anything other then a non-neutral advert made up of basic non-encyclopedic facts if it is based purely (or mainly) on the institutions website. Given that, I see zero reason to not to delete the article. It's not like it can't be recreated when adequate sourcing materializes, if it ever does. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.