Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidya Yeravdekar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vidya Yeravdekar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not an academic. The post of "principle director" of Symbiosis Society doesn't seem to be an academic post. I looked closely and it seems this society was started by her father and she joined it later. I do not see any way the subject satisfies WP:PROF. The coverage about the subject is mostly inherited coverage of the form "Symbiosis principal director, Vidya Yeravdekar, said...", there is hardly any significant coverage focusing on her. In any case, this seems to be a BLP1E. Finally, the entire article is a copyvio. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as certainly not convincing for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF, and there isn't anything else to suggest notability in another capacity. SwisterTwister talk 18:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- an unremarkable executive; notability is not inherited from institutions that the subject works for, nor from more notable relatives. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable individual Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:31, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Yes, subject fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF. What about WP:GNG? Sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], more. (I'm not interested in doing a rewrite as of this moment.). For India-related topics, please use google custom search instead (see WP:INDAFD). Anup [Talk] 22:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Tiny cites on GS. Undoubtedly a worthy person but fails WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.