Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vera Ivanko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sense of this discussion was that the actress did not reach notability prior to (or since) her untimely death. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vera Ivanko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. A little-known actress of episodic roles.--RTY9099 (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 23:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 23:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 23:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Searching her anglicized name ("Vera Ivanko") on Google yields almost no results. But, if you search her name in its native Cyrillic script ("Вера Иванко") there are substantially more available sources. I don't know if the nominator speaks/reads Russian and already made the determination that the available sources were not enough to establish notability, but, if not, it might be more valuable to this discussion to consult someone who can. Gargleafg (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Probably for some more assessment of Eastmain's sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 04:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.