Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V7 Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. per G11 - obvious spam SmartSE (talk) 18:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

V7 Ltd

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convincing. Two WP:TECHCRUNCH articles, one forbes which is based on crunchbase, so almost a company listing, one possibly in-depth bloomberg which I didn't have the subscription to check. Others are non independent. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 23:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Computing, and United Kingdom. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 23:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have just realized this is a premature AfD, if there is more useful content introduced I will withdraw nom. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 23:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comments and reading through the article. I have added more substance to some of the story points to review if you find these acceptable:

- Details on the use by Merck KGAA of image tagging software in the chemical and health industry

- Details on NVIDIA's use of V7 in their product line.

- Details on a public NHS collaboration on open data from 2020.

I have also added a couple of more substantial references that aren't from press blogs like TechCrunch.

Thanks again Paradigm Shifting1 (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep barely. I cleaned up some of the unreferenced material. I think this barely passes GNG, and will probably have more sources in the future. // Timothy :: talk 07:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.