Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Used machine tools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Used machine tools

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable topic; does the existence of a catalog really mean this topic is notable? At the very least this article should be merged into machine tools. Wizard191 (talk) 02:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Admittedly, we have Used car and Used book. Used car makes sense; Used book is a pretty iffy article; this one seems to have no justification. Used machine tools aren't particularly different from new machine tools, and we certainly don't need "Used X" for every product "X." I think we can accept that most products will have a used market without having to believe that all such are notable, and this one is not. By the way, the article mentions trade fairs for used machines, but this article is supposed to be about machine tools. Glenfarclas (talk) 04:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Agree with User:Glenfarclas. Patent nonsense unworthy of inclusion in encyclopedia. Annette46 (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.