Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Moving Systems
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 9/11 advance-knowledge debate#Israel. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Urban Moving Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable. Some Israelis working for the company were questioned and released in the days soon after 9/11 before them and the company went back to Israel. There's a theory that they are related to Israeli intelligence, but other than that, there's nothing notable about this company which no longer exists. IIIVIX (Talk) 23:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to 9/11 advance-knowledge debate#Israel (or possibly other related article) as it is a common enough search term and is discussed there. No evidence that it needs its own article though. Rd232 talk 18:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to 9/11 advance-knowledge debate#Israel per above. A Google News Archive search only returns passing mentions or results related to the 9/11 questionings. Cunard (talk) 00:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as suggested above. There are also a few articles in those google news archive results about the moving business being shady (apart from 9/11), but not enough to confer independent notability. The only mainpage link to this [1] is the suggested redirect target, which has more relevant information than this article, so redirecting there is appropriate, as it doesn't have any size issues that would suggest splitting.--chaser - t 03:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.