Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up Against It (band)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Up Against It (band)[edit]
- Up Against It (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod removed, Not notable band. Off2riorob (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Appears to fail WP:BAND as the only claim of notability is having a single member who is the son of a claimed notable singer. The claimed notable singer is not in the band though - just the son of the notable singer. Otherwise this is just a local band that does not yet appear to be notable in any reliable sources. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I had speedied this when it first arrived. No edits since then have demonstrated any more notability for the band. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:40, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:31, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no notability per nom. (GregJackP (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
- Delete No claim to notability. Aiken ♫ 01:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.