Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled (group)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Untitled (group)[edit]
- Untitled (group) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet any criteria in WP:BAND. Closest is #5 (Has released two or more albums on a major label or on one of the more important indie labels), but it does not seem that the mix tapes were released on a major label. Singularity42 (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have worked to clean this article up, but I agree with the nominator that this band does not yet seem to meet the criteria for inclusion. Two mixtapes, and a deal that may eventually produce an album, doesn't really seem to make muster. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not presently notable; I just blocked the creator. Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.