Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Birmingham Boat Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to Draft:University of Birmingham Boat Club. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

University of Birmingham Boat Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced sports club article, doesn't provide any notability Aloneinthewild (talk) 14:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improve the article I could find both first party and second party sources with more here. The article should be given a chance to improve before being deleted. --The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You do realise, the first source refers to an entirely different club from the University of Warwick, the second is from the universities own newspaper (not independent) and doesn't really focus on the club at all, and the third is not really a reliable source at all. Additionally, google news turns up nothing. I'm usually an advocate for keeping club articles, but Birmingam really doesn't meet the requirements Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: not ready for the main space yet but there are more than enough sources to pass GNG. They just need putting in! DrStrauss talk 16:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
draftify per the Dr. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 00:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.