Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal's Aventura Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Universal's Aventura Hotel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hotel is WP:Run-of-the-mill and fails the following requirement per WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Wikiwriter700 (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 08:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominated, as even though it is owned by Universal Studios, it does not really fall under WP:GNG notability guidelines yet. As not really that many other sources to really make a who article about. I would either suggest merge into Universal Studios, or move it into a draft to be worked on. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 08:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Universal Orlando Resort, since it is located there. Foxnpichu (talk) 12:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there are no indications that this hotel is notable and I am unable to locate a single reference that meets the criteria for notability. I considered the option to Merge but the hotel is already mentioned at the Universal Orlando Resort article so in my mind, there's no content that should be merged. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." // Timothy :: talk 08:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.