Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrich Larsen - The Mole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Mole: Undercover in North Korea. plicit 00:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ulrich Larsen - The Mole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would like to propose the deletion of this article - Larsen's only notable mention is the fact that Larsen is the subject of the documentary: The Mole: Undercover in North Korea. I would like to suggest that the article covering the documentary sufficiently covers Larsen as a subject - most significantly due to the fact that none of the listed citations or any significant, reliable sources that I were able to find mentions Larsen outside the context of the documentary. askeuhd (talk) 07:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 11:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to a report by BBC Korea on October 11, 2020, a company named 'Chosun Narae Trading Company' was mentioned in a UN panel of experts report for its alleged involvement in North Korea's illicit arms trade. This is similar to the company 'Narae Trading Agency' which appeared in Larssen's documentary as a front company for North Korea's weapons trade. As the documentary and the UN panel report share this similarity, it can be considered credible. Therefore, just as many articles related to North Korea are being maintained despite a lack of sufficient reliability and objectivity, I believe that this article should also be kept. Kloyan.L (talk) 07:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller (hy/hym) (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.