Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UP Yoddha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh 666 19:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UP Yoddha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local sports team with no references for notability. Fails WP:ORGCRIT. Hagennos (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – A quick search shows that all relevant info about the team is covered in multiple independent reliable sources, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc. In fact, thousands of other articles in English/Hindi national media can be found here & here, and they cover every relevant detail of the team. Such coverage seems enough for WP:GNG. BTW, the parent article (Pro Kabaddi) is already quite lengthy. So the above article is a valid WP:SPINOFF as well. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics ^Talk 07:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I've added references. Notable enough as other teams from the same league also have articles. MT Train^Discuss 14:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are a lot of sources provided by NitinMlk which demonstrate that the subject passes WP:GNG. Pratyush (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep —— Passes WP: GNG and WP: Org.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.