Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyana Hansen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tyana Hansen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non notable model. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Like the oft deleted Parnia Porsche she was part of a controversial advertising campaign but has no independent notability. Coverage is about that campaign or tabloid. Like that Porsche article this was created by an editor dedicated to promoting one individual and his business interests. The relevant business here is Ultra Tune, the business promoted in that advertising campaign. Pure PR. Probable UPE. See also fellow Ultra Tune model at afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lydall. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Definitely fails the WP:GNG, WP:NACTRESS, and WP:NMODEL. Lacks independent significant coverage. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 21:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A non-notable model. Barca (talk) 20:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A notable model. WP:NMODEL#3. Playboy cover girl is notable. Wm335td (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - has not had significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - does not meet WP:NMODEL or WP:ANYBIO or WP:BASIC - Epinoia (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.