Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan King (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan King[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only WP:ROUTINE sources. Fails WP:NHOCKEY by never playing in a highly covered league for long enough and no individual awards that I can find. Previously deleted in 2008 and recreated in 2013 when he played in 100 pro games, the standard that has since been more strictly defined in NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 17:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The product of an editor who ultimately received a community ban on new article creation for the many hundreds of NN articles (often in open defiance of both community consensus and appropriate notability guidelines) made to bump up his page creation count. As with the vast majority of these articles, the subject here is a journeyman hockey player in the mid-minors with an undistinguished career. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG beyond routine sports coverage explicitly debarred from satisfying notability. Ravenswing 06:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails both NHOCKEY and GNG.18abruce (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT: Fails WP:NHOCKEY repeatedly recreated. AaronWikia (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SALT seems a bit much, when it was re-made in 2013 (5 years after it was first deleted), he met the then lower standards for NHOCKEY. It is not like this page has been getting re-made by vandals and the like. Yosemiter (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any evidence he meets WP:GNG. And the NHOCKEY standards have been strengthened since he was created so he no longer gets a reprieve that way. -DJSasso (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.