Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Purt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Purt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 1 article links to this. Coverage merely confirms roles he's held or statements he's said representing his employer and not WP:SIGCOV. There are elements of an WP:ATTACK page with the controversies section. LibStar (talk) 05:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of biography-related deletion discussions. NYC Guru (talk) 08:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC) – used for tagging active AfD discussions.[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 09:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, passes WP:NBIO based the two articles [1][2] documenting the subject resigning from two separate health boards amid controversy. It seems unwarranted however to link him to other controversies that he has merely publicly commented on. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 16:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article's creator, Rathfelder was indefinitely community-banned] for multiple abuses, including creating attack BLPs where they had a conflict of interest. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 04:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on this and the fact the creator's COI was in the same subject area, I think the way forward (as per WP:ATTACK) would be to reduce this page to a stub - removing all of the tangentially connected information about the controversies linked to the subject. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 12:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this was an attack page, nothing we should be keeping. Hardly notable, he said stuff people didn't like. Oaktree b (talk) 17:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - currently appears to be a minor C-suite executive in a fairly minor corporation. Previously a senior NHS executive. Neither, as far as I can tell, give sufficient notability. It is claimed that he has a university title (Professor) but I have not been able to verify that this is more than a visiting/honorary title. Other than that, there are fairly local controversies relating to previous public sector jobs. I can't see that any of this amounts to much. JMWt (talk) 08:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While the coverage is borderline on WP:BASIC, I think the BLP issues especially with respect to the creator mean it's worth deleting history instead of trying to recover something from this. —siro χ o 09:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.