Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tressor Baptiste
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence of notability under GNG, NGRIDIRON, etc. No prejudice to recreation if he should play in a pro game. joe deckertalk to me 16:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tressor Baptiste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Baptiste has yet to play a Pro football game for the Seahawks, and his college football career appears otherwise not notable. Appears to fail WP:NGRIDIRON, without prejudice to recreate once he's played a Pro game. Shirt58 (talk) 13:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Edit: appending, "without prejudice to recreate" as per Paul McDonald --Shirt58 (talk) 10:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Failing WP:NGRIDIRON, I'm looking to see if he meets WP:GNG with multiples independent sources of significant coverage. So far I am only finding SILive.com and kristv.com to be the only sources with non-trivial coverage. Note that GNG says "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability." Is there any other signif coverage outside of his hometown or college town?—Bagumba (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice to recreate --Paul McDonald (talk) 22:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not appear to be currently notable. No prejudice against recreation if circumstances change or sufficient sources turn up. cmadler (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:ATHLETE Secret account 00:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nobody has uncovered other sources of significant coverage after my initial comment. Fails GNG without sufficient number of sources with significant coverage.—Bagumba (talk) 01:36, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.