Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trends-Tendances
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Trends-Tendances[edit]
- Trends-Tendances (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Magazine that fails WP:GNG. I could not find independent sources about this magazine. The Banner talk 14:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Check the Dutch or French versions of the page and you will find them. Best regards --EdWalker58 (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have checked the French article and it does not contain any useful sources. Two of the 'references' are just links to sites described as being 'competitors' of the magazine. The other references are all either links to the magazine itself (and other sites run by the same company) or dead links. I can't help with the Dutch one as I don't speak Dutch. —Noiratsi (talk) 15:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Trends-Tendances — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.133.30.19 (talk) 19:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- In fact just some statistics, no real information. Most interesting fact they offer is the circulation, roughly between 50,000 and 55,000 magazines per issue. Rather small. The Banner talk 18:57, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have checked the French article and it does not contain any useful sources. Two of the 'references' are just links to sites described as being 'competitors' of the magazine. The other references are all either links to the magazine itself (and other sites run by the same company) or dead links. I can't help with the Dutch one as I don't speak Dutch. —Noiratsi (talk) 15:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Check the Dutch or French versions of the page and you will find them. Best regards --EdWalker58 (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.