Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Title Contender

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. With a single delete vote and having been twice relisted with no history of previous contested deletion, I am treating this as an expired Prod. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title Contender[edit]

Title Contender (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This also appears to be a horse that fails notability; won two grade III races, and while they are somewhat notable Grade III races, there is nothing in this article to distinguish this horse...he's a gelding and his last race was a claiming race in 2015 (per equibase) Montanabw(talk) 18:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree - He had a decent 2013 but tailed off badly to fall to the claiming ranks. Was claimed after last start for $16K and nothing since. Jlvsclrk (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jupitus Smart 17:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguisttalk|contribs 08:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.