Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TinyButStrong (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lack of multiple (discovered, not presumed) sources that meet WP:GNG requirements. RL0919 (talk) 18:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TinyButStrong[edit]

TinyButStrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not notable Clnreee (talk) 06:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep on the basis that sources like this do exist and there are probably more hidden behind web.archive and the like. I'm rather persuaded by a lot of the keep arguments in the previous afd while also having to acknowledge that I can't find anything beyond what the original author linked in that first afd. Nole (chat·edits) 00:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG due to a complete lack of sustained WP:SIGCOV. I found no new sources on this topic in a WP:BEFORE search I did and we do not keep articles based on vague beliefs that better sources might exist and be found one day. That is pure WP:CRYSTALBALL. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.