Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiago Ghidotti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tiago Ghidotti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find multiple reliable sources with significant discussion of this individual. There are many references in the article, but most do not mention him, or are PR pieces (no byline). ... discospinster _talk 16:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 16:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 16:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - another promotional PR article from the same editor as for another three articles nominated for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject fails every point in WP:GNG, and is simply a promotional fluffed up article.
Delete Pure vanity piece about a non-notable individual, fails WP:BIO with flying colours, despite the valiant refbombing efforts. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of good sources and WP:TOOSOON. It cites blogs, Press Releases, social media, and Wikipedia itself. He appears to be a young blogger, so his career has a long way to go. Bearian (talk) 22:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reason as Renato Cipriano. Article that is a clear attempt to use Wikipedia as a means of promotion. Plus, the creator is almost surely a paid editor who creates articlers for non-notable people as a means of promotion. In the PT.WP this article was created and deleted several times for being WP:PROMO.--SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 01:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not the proper place for promotional adultation. We are not a free for all, modern incaranation of Who's Who, nor are we an alternative to LinkedIn.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.