Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thumpstar
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thumpstar[edit]
- Thumpstar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of importance, content is minimal and writing style is confusing... Needs to be cleaned up or expanded in case it has to be retained Ajayupai95 (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 00:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I agree the prose is funky, but a search shows this is a fairly popular product, and we do strive to document notability even in products, so long as we're not being part of advertisement drives. I'd even say this should be an article for the company. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.