Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thong Girl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Who woulda thunk it?. - Philippe 14:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thong Girl[edit]

What to say? Fails about every standard we have and certainly does not belong in an encyclopedia. Eusebeus (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nonnotable, seems to be all made up, no sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Sadly, not only is it not made up there is whiff of notability. I'm neutral at this time pending further investigation (yes, I said that with a straight face). Xymmax (talk) 00:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. My vote is hanging by a thong on this one. A mayor got into hot water for allowing Thong Girl 3 to be filmed at city hall. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Has a crack at notability, but may not have it tied up. Needs better sources, which are at present rather thin. --Dhartung | Talk 01:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have no opinion on the matter, however what I present is the websites self proclaimed media section[1]. Yanksox (talk) 03:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prove it no decision until we can see the pictures of itFlutterdance (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. The entry has a link to a website and it seems like a legitimate comic character. Why wouldn't it be included in this wikipedia? Dwaltzwriter (talk) 17:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Kind of erupted into a local controversy when the mayor let it be filmed in his office...trust me...there are TONS of sources...I just don't really want to search "Thong Girl" at work... --Smashville^BONK! 20:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go...[2][3] --Smashville^BONK! 03:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep sourced movie. JJL (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep judging by the sources. DGG (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.