Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Ybarra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G11 speedy; I agree with MQS DGG ( talk ) 16:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Ybarra[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to meet our sourcing requirements for biographies, as it has maybe one independent published source that refers substantially to the subject. Steven Walling • talk 22:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find no relevant sources that establish notability. To me the article also looks more like promotional material than a neutral article. 109a152a8a146 (talk) 23:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he's not yet notable enough for inclusion. Bearian (talk) 23:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy G-11 Delete per WP:PROMOTE and WP:COI One article in the quite local Inland Valley Daily Bulletin does not equate to WP:SIGCOV, but it is quite difficult for a talent manager and acting coach to find enough coverage to be considered worthy of note... just as this one does not. And while a sense of promotion might otherwise sometimes be addressable, we would need reliable sources for verifiability... and we lack them. I find a COI in that we we have a SPA author User:Itmstudio writing about the person who runs "In The Moment Acting Studio".[1] Coincidence? I think not. Hope the author reads WP:NAU and does not attempt to promte Ybarra or his company here. I think it best that his IMDB resume link to Wikipedia becomes a deadlink. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:10, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.