Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Week in Startups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Joe (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This Week in Startups[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Sign of Notability Jtbobwaysf (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per WP:WEB. No significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:54, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:WEB requirements enough to warrant page creation. Masterholtz (talk) 13:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:WEB requirements. In addition, significant podcast with good reputation.Knox490 (talk) 01:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject seems notable. Barca (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jason Calacanis. I don't think there is any content worth merging from it. Of its sources, Philly Mag and Forbes are not WP:SIGCOV, being lists of many many podcasts; the Business Insider source is not specifically about This Week in Startups, instead it is about Calacanis' misstep on Twitter in relation to offering people slots on the podcast. I searched for more sources and found nothing. No SIGCOV, does not satisfy WP:NWEB or WP:GNG. -Lopifalko (talk) 18:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (web) and WP:SIGCOV. I added an article from The Wall Street Journal.4meter4 (talk) 18:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@4meter4: I cannot access it, does it have WP:SIGCOV? -Lopifalko (talk) 19:12, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Middling. They picked up a story from the podcast which to me indicates some significance.4meter4 (talk) 19:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We need coverage that specifically deals with the podcast itself, or a significant amount of the article does so. In my view there are as yet no sources that do that. -Lopifalko (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.