Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thebroken (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kevin Rose. There's a weak consensus not to keep it, and no reason that Phantom's support of a redirect would be challenged by any of the delete votes. No strong reason has been given to delete the article before making the redirect. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thebroken

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Fails WP:WEB & WP:GNG. No sources found. Otterathome (talk) 19:10, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One of at least six nominations by the same nominator for programming by Revision3 : Web Drifter AfD, Infected by Martin Sargent AfD, GeekBeat.TV AfD, Thebroken AfD, HD Nation AfD, IFanboy AfD. Anarchangel (talk) 21:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to have gone away without leaving a lasting impression on anyone. Not a strong consensus in original AfD. --Kvng (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete then redirect to Kevin Rose - although the subject itself is not notable enough for a stand-alone article, it strikes me that it is a valid search term. Any suitable content can be merged with Rose's article (I know that the article mentions Dan Huard as co-host, but the article about Rose is more substantial, and better-sourced) PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.