Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Path We Chose (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Path We Chose (band)[edit]

The Path We Chose (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable band. Promotion written by a band member. No sign of any notabilty. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Sourced to the like of imdb, press releases, youtube and primary. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 13:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 13:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails the GNG. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 13:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Article created by band member, and no decent independent sources whatsoever – just a couple of run-of-the-mill quotes from an article in The Street about how Connecticut hip hop is finally getting recognised, nothing about the group itself [1]. It's not clear whether the group is still active – their last YouTube posts were five years ago, and their official website is simply a holding page. Richard3120 (talk) 13:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Street. "BY PR Newswire" duffbeerforme (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I know – even if it had been a better source, there's still no in-depth coverage of the group... I was just saying that's literally the best source I could find, and it's still not an acceptable one. Richard3120 (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I'm from CT and I can't find anything about them directly querying local sources, either. Markvs88 (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.