Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mark & Brian Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 07:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Mark & Brian Show[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a radio program, not properly referenced as notable. WP:NMEDIA does not confer an automatic notability freebie on radio programs just because they're stated as having been syndicated to more than just one station -- the notability test for radio programs is the reception of reliable source media coverage in sources independent of the show's own self-published web presence. But the only references here are self-published ones -- one host's résumé and the other host's new podcast -- and the article has been tagged for referencing problems since 2009 without improvement. Bearcat (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and fix - I haven't paid much attention to this article since creating it as a virtual stub ten years ago. This nationally-syndicated show received a NAB Marconi Award so the subject matter is notable, but I agree that the references need some work. Adding this to my to-do list ... Engineer Bob (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished some initial cleanup work which hopefully addresses both notability and lack of references. Engineer Bob (talk) 01:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—seems OK, esp. with Bob's improvements. Gaelan 💬✏️ 00:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.