Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Day After Roswell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per Snow, notability has been clearly established. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Day After Roswell

Fails WP:BK. ScienceApologist (talk) 02:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of the best-known books about UFOs. The article already contains a link to a lengthy Skeptical Inquirer article, and there's more material out there. Let me work on this article a little bit. This is an interesting twist. Zagalejo^^^ 03:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to meet WP:BK; it was on the NYT best seller list for ages, and it seems to have received multiple reviews. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 04:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Needs some work by???? Looks fine. Vufors (talk) 10:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:BK by a comfortable margin, and a good reminder of the value of double-checking for notability even if not well asserted by the article. Nice rescue by Zagalejo. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability established, thank you Zagalejo - Eldereft (cont.) 16:35, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.