Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beast Within (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW keep, as revised. BD2412 T 00:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Beast Within (novel)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that is just a plot summary. Fails WP:GNG. None of the information in the article is mentioned in its two provided sources, save the title and author name dropped in one article about a movie not actually about the book. Found no WP:SIGCOV of the book anywhere, just a very small WP:RUNOFTHEMILL book review article. Author Edward Levy is also currently at AfD. Newshunter12 (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK either, and I wasn't able to find much about it on my searches. Isabelle ^🔔 01:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to keep after the addition of the new sources. Isabelle ^🔔 18:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I added three reviews to a Reception section from The Dayton Daily News ("Here's a good read for a full moon"), The Raleigh News and Observer ("Three tall tales of the supernatural") and The Johnson City Press ("A most horrifying story"). I believe that this demonstrates notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coming up with reviews from 40 years ago is a feat, I must say. A good result, satisfies notability. -- Whiteguru (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Available references justified the notability of the subject. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RS is noted for the book, and the book was made into a movie as well. Deathlibrarian (talk) 16:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after recent changes -- more good work from Toughpigs. --Lockley (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after recent changes. Nika2020 (talk) 21:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.