Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Atheist Experience
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Atheist Experience[edit]
- The Atheist Experience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) %u2013 (View log)
Article is on the verge of spam and is about a non-notable local cable access program. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The main contributor has also done similar articles with Non-Prophets Radio and Atheist Community of Austin. Should those be AFDed as well?--CyberGhostface (talk) 13:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per Nom, Spam DavidWS (contribs) 15:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree - spam, unreferenced, fails notability.Yachtsman1 (talk) 23:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN local television show, no RS coverage. Jclemens (talk) 02:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following conversation occurred on the author's talk page, and has been transcribed here as part of the AfD discussion:
How am I supposed to get a page started if you guys continually delete it for this "notability"
By what measure is that? I can find tons of radio shows, podcasts, non-profit organizations, and similar which all have entries.
This is not spam. I spent hours last night trying to conform to what your other mods were editing to clean up.. and ya'll delete everything. I don't get it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeptics_guide ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanguiness (talk • contribs)
- Please refer to the guidelines for notability. Basically, if your cable access show has been the subject of multiple significant third-party coverage (something beyond a local interest newspaper), then it would meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. If you'll take a close look at the article you provided as an example, that particular podcast is notable for 1) having had many major nationally notable guests and 2) having received significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Also, as this article has been submitted for a deletion, this discussion should properly be held on the page's AfD page. With that in mind, I will transcribe this discussion to that page. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.