Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Argues: The Movie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Nathan Johnson (talk) 03:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

The Argues: The Movie

The Argues: The Movie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

just released movie, no google news, no reviews. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - Can we at least TRY to find reliable sources before nominating an article for deletion? I easily found these articles:

• http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2010/10/26/3048895.htm
• http://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/blogs/cinetopia/now-showing-20110310-1boyl.html
• http://www.ignitionnews.com.au/all-good-things-must-come-arguably-to-an-end/ 11coolguy12 (talk) 01:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

• Keep per flaws of nominator's terse nomination statement:

1. "just released movie".

   Sorry, but woefully incorrect, as the article itself states the film was released nearly a year ago In November of 2010.

2. "no google news".

   Incorrect, as User:11coolguy12 shares, all one need do is do a diligent search looking beyond the limitaions of the Find sources Google News archive search.

3. "no reviews",

   Again wrong.. see previous refutation.

So while yes, the article will benefit from some work, notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation within an article. THAT issue is best addressed with a suitable cleanup tag on the article, as we do not delete a new article on a possibly notable film topic if concerns can otherwise be addressed through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - No valid reason has been given for deletion. TheMadBaron (talk) 07:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. Maybe delete the sections and just keep the main part as this is a non-funny movie which no one besides the actors could be bother actually making this better then a stud page. Ray-Rays 20:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond88824 (talk • contribs)
  • WP:IDONTLIKEIT, then? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.