User talk:TheMadBaron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive

Archives

1| 2

If you leave a note for me here, I will reply (if a reply is required) on your user talk page. TheMadBaron

The Signpost: 22 August 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:40, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:09, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011[edit]


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Wickliffe[edit]

I just reverted your edits to Dean Wickliffe, because as the banner at the otp of the page notes, I'm in the middle of work on the page and there was an edit conflict. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ottone Rosai copyright concerns[edit]

Footer on their website means that: "Only contents of the on-line collection of the website www.artgate-cariplo.it are licensed under CC BY-SA License". Please read Talk:Sebastiano_De_Albertis. Thank you. --M.casanova (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I always wrote "CC BY-SA" (Creative Commons - Attribution - Share Alike license) near the source in the article. Thank you --M.casanova (talk) 14:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad ibn Wasil[edit]

Hello,

I saw the recent WikiProject Biography rating that you left on the article Muhammad ibn Wasil. As the initial (and so far only) contributor to that article, I was wondering if you had any specific comments about the content or style that you thought could use improvement. If so, I'd like to see if I can make those changes so that the article quality can be improved. Please let me know what you think about it. Thanks, Ro4444 (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. I saw your reply and your edits to the article, thank you for both. I agreed with a lot of what you said. I did want to address some of the concerns you brought up, as well as point out any areas where we may be in disagreement.
1. In terms of providing background information for regional and personal names. When creating or editing articles regarding ancient or medieval states or persons, I tend to look to articles on Wikipedia about the Roman Empire for information, since this empire has more articles and attention paid to it than most. As with the Abbasid caliphate, the Roman Empire had a number of provinces or regions that would be familiar even to a casual reader today - such as Egypt, Gaul, Syria and Britain - but it also had a number that would not be familiar to anyone who didn't have an active interest in the subject - such as Raetia, Bithynia, Galatia, Pontus, and so on. From what I have seen, when it comes to articles about historical persons that are connected to such more obscure regions, the general treatment is to assume that the reader already has a sufficient level of knowledge to be able to identify the regions in question. For example, the article Marcus Lollius starts off as follows:

Marcus Lollius Paulinus, Roman was a general, the first governor of Galatia (25 BC) and served as consul in 21 BC. In 16 BC, when governor of Gaul (Bergmanus), he was defeated by the Sicambri and Tencteri and Usipetes, German tribes who had crossed the Rhine.

Similarly, the article Sossianus Hierocles is begun as follows:

Sossianus Hierocles (fl. 303) was a late Roman aristocrat and office-holder. He served as a praeses in Syria under Diocletian at some time in the 290s. He was then made vicarius of some district, perhaps Oriens (the East, including Syria, Palestine, and, at the time, Egypt) until 303, when he was transferred to Bithynia.

In such cases, the assumption appears to be that a reader would not look up people like Marcus Lollius or Sossianus Hierocles unless they already possessed knowledge of regions like Galatia and Bithynia. They do not explain, for example, that Galatia is a former region in ancient Anatolia; this is something the reader already knows. Similarly, in the Abbasid caliphate, there were a number of provinces and districts that would be instantly recognizable to anyone even today - Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Armenia, Egypt - but some that would not be, like Fars, Kirman, Khurasan, Tabaristan, or Yamamah. However, unless the article in question dealt with VERY general subject matter, I would generally not feel the need to specify where these places are. Furthermore, while names like Galatia or Raetia are defunct today, places like Fars, Kirman and Sistan are even today active geographrical and administrative units; therefore anyone with even cursory knowledge of the areas in question would likely recognize them. Also, in the case of Muhammad ibn Wasil specifically, it is practically impossible that someone would know of him unless they also knew of the Saffarid amir of Sistan, Ya'qub ibn al-Layth, since Muhammad's story is so inextricably tied to Ya'qub's. This is why I did not provide in-text clarification regarding regions like Fars or Sistan, or of persons like Ya'qub, because if a reader knows about Muhammad, he HAS to have heard of these things already.
Finally in regards to this point, I would argue that such a level of clarification, if applied equally over a number of similarly-themed articles, would get repetitive very quickly. If someone was to undertake the task of creating separate articles for every single governor of Fars during the Abbasid era, I don't think it would be appropriate to start off each and every article with "XXXX was the Abbasid governor of Fars, a province in the south-central region of what today is Iran, from Year X to Year Y." It would be sufficient to say "XXXX was the Abbasid governor of Fars from Year X to Year Y." I guess in short, if a reader is looking up a governor of Fars, it's safe to assume they know where Fars is.
2. Your cleanup of the link redirects was helpful, but I had a question on one of them. Al-Ahwaz was changed to redirect to Politics of Khuzestan Province, for reasons I was unsure of. I believe the original link was appropriate and should be reverted back, but I wanted to go over it with you first.
3. In regard to the use of the term amir, I was a little uncomfortable with that myself. Normally I would just use the term "governor," but strictly speaking at this point in time, Ya'qub was not a governor, but a ruffian and a military adventurer who had taken advantage of years of anarchy in Sistan to make himself the effective ruler of it. Ya'qub never fancied himself an independent ruler and generally attempted to make himself "legitimate" in the eyes of the Abbasid political establishment, but his legal status was in state of limbo at this time. I wanted to avoid that lengthly description on Muhammad's article, since that information appropriately belongs on Ya'qub's article instead, so I opted to use the general term amir instead. Regarding the term amir itself, it's an extremely common one for this period of history, so it wouldn't cause any confusion to anyone likely to read the article. I've also found that the common transliteration for this term during the classical period is amir, not "emir," and most modern historians who write about this era use the former, but since both forms are so similar to each other I'm content to leave it as is.
4. As for sub-headings, these would probably be helpful. My discomfort with using them is that Muhammad's history as the ruler of Fars is fragmented, with gaps of up to over a year in the narrative. Since he tended to be only be mentioned by the Muslim historians during periods when he was dealing with either the Abbasid government or Ya'qub, there are substantial periods of time where little to nothing is known of his activities. Again, this is an idea worth implementing and I'll try and format it accordingly; I'm just cautious to do so since sub-headings could give the wrong impression about what periods he was or wasn't ruling.
5. Finally, I would be firmly in disagreement with any use of either the term "Iran" or "Persia." In the Umayyad and Abbasid administrative geography of the time, it had no meaning. The Iranian provinces of the empire - Jibal, Tabaristan, Gurgan, Khurasan, Fars, Kirman, Sistan, etc. - were more often than not under separate governorships, and while these provinces certainly had a culture that was distinct from the Arabian, Berber or other parts of the empire, they were by no means unified. The term "Iran" itself was in a period of disuse, although it shortly later would enjoy a resurgance with the downfall of Abbasid power in the east and the rise of amirates ruled by native Iranians. But in regards to this article, I don't think it's a term that should be used. If anything, Fars would be termed in the contemporary terminology as an "eastern" province, not an Iranian one. Furthermore, the term "Iran" has political connoctations and I think that the neutrality of the article is maintained better if it is not used.
Sorry for the long response; I didn't mean for this to be so lengthly when I started out. I hope this answers some of your concerns. It's always good to see someone else who's interested in working on articles dealing with this time period, and if you have any comments I look forward to reading them. Thanks, Ro4444 (talk) 03:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:11, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back![edit]

Welcome back! Judging from your user page, you were around WikiProject Film some time ago. Since you have the cinema collaboration of the week mentioned on your page, you may be interested in a discussion about collaborating on film articles for their anniversaries in 2012 here. Hope you can collaborate with a vengeance! :) Erik (talk | contribs) 21:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the welcome. Yes, I was doing a fair bit of work on film articles after I found that most filmographies were in need of disambiguation. After I'd run up some 10,000 edits, the powers that be decided that my IP was a proxy (this was news to me) and kept blocking it, so I gave up. I'll probably get back to doing some more serious work on films eventually, but right now I'm just dabbling (albeit with a vengeance). I'm still trying to remember how everything works. Besides, the powers that be might, at any moment, decide that my ISP is Satan, or something. TheMadBaron (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    No problem! The collaboration will be pretty long-term. You can see guidelines at MOS:FILM; they've changed a lot in the past few years. Feel free to message me on my talk page with any questions! Erik (talk | contribs) 22:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback from RJaguar3[edit]

Hello, TheMadBaron. You have new messages at RJaguar3's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RJaguar3 | u | t 16:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:32, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Argues: The Movie for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Argues: The Movie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Argues: The Movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello TheMadBaron! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 November2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Good Humor
I award you this because I happened across your userpage and I read most of the amusing articles you listed. I am certainly going to share the "You have two cows" joke with many others!! Glimmer721 talk 01:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

High Speed Pursuit Syndrome[edit]

Hi, I removed the speedy from this article and left a note on the creator's page as to why the article is still problematic. No prejudice against an AfD if you think this is the way to go due to notability or something like WP:NEO or WP:IINFO. Cheers, --Fæ (talk) 10:16, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrolling[edit]

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. I noticed you recently tagged Institut Saint André for varios maintenance issues. The number of tags is excessive. PLease consider tagging articles that need an obvious clean up with only the essential templates. Thanks, and happy patrolling! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Satele Shan[edit]

Hello TheMadBaron. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Satele Shan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this is not a copyvio because the source page is released under CC-BY-SA. Consider PROD or AfD - this character may well not be independently notable, and Wikipedia is not Wookiepedia and should not bother with copies of it. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 14:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Hi, thanks for bringing my article on Fanny White up to Wikipedia standards. I haven't posted before and so didn't know all the tweaks needed. Janeweaving (talk) 17:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 November 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before I decline your A10 speedy....[edit]

Please share the link to the existing English Wikipedia topic that the article Mazhai Nerathu Mazhaithuli is supposed to dupicate. Thank you. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 November 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2011[edit]

WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The March 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 December 2011[edit]

The Signpost: 12 December 2011[edit]

The Signpost: 19 December 2011[edit]

The Signpost: 26 December 2011[edit]

The Signpost: 02 January 2012[edit]

WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 January 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 16 January 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 23 January 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 30 January 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 06 February 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 13 February 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 20 February 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 27 February 2012[edit]

New Page Triage engagement strategy released[edit]

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyes@wikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter[edit]

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 March 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 19 March 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 26 March 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 02 April 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 09 April 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 16 April 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 23 April 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 07 May 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 14 May 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 21 May 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 28 May 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 04 June 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 11 June 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 18 June 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 25 June 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 02 July 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 16 July 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 30 July 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 06 August 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 13 August 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 27 August 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 03 September 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 10 September 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 17 September 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 01 October 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 15 October 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 22 October 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 21 January 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 28 January 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 11 February 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 18 February 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 11 March 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 18 March 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 01 April 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 08 April 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 22 April 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 13 May 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 20 May 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 27 May 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 05 June 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013[edit]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest[edit]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi TheMadBaron,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October![edit]

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema![edit]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheree Winton for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheree Winton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheree Winton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October![edit]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of King Baggot (cinematographer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King Baggot (cinematographer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Baggot (cinematographer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dumb Luck (film)[edit]

Notice

The article Dumb Luck (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dumb Luck (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dumb Luck (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dumb Luck (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 02:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheMadBaron&oldid=1168308918"