Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenrehte Technologies, Inc. (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 05:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tenrehte Technologies, Inc.[edit]

Tenrehte Technologies, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was clearly created by the business owner to promote his own business. A look at the article creators history shows more pages with a similar genesis, all having one individual in common. Tr0gd0r (talk) 03:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and not only was the 2011 AfD basically closely available for a Delete, the sheer fact it was an advertising-only account is sufficient and there's literally nothing else suggesting better, so we should not mistake it as such; there's honestly nothing else because that's all there is to say, therefore that alone also seals the fact this only existed as an advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- a promo article on an unremarkable company. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.