Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teletext Broadcast Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teletext Broadcast Services[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is undoubtedly not significant now, but was it ever? DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 06:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I searched online and found no significant coverage.--Rpclod (talk) 06:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing better than the usual mentions, nothing convincingly better. Notifying Wikicology for African insight. SwisterTwister talk 08:40, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sadly no evidence of notability. I can't find the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources to establish the company's notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 14:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 14:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.