Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenmar Mallanna
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Teenmar Mallanna[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Teenmar Mallanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looked at this several times, over the past couple weeks. Fails WP:NPOL. Routine coverage. scope_creepTalk 15:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Unsuccessful candidate for the 2015 and 2021 Graduate MLC elections in Nalgonda-Khammam-Warangal. Fails WP:NPOL. --Enos733 (talk) 18:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they did not win, but this passes neither of the tests that a candidate actually has to clear to earn special treatment: properly sourced evidence that he had preexisting notability for other reasons independent of unsuccessful election candidacies, or a credible reason to deem his candidacies much more special than everybody else's candidacies in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance. Bearcat (talk) 17:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.