Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Tracey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. No prejudice to an immediate renomination to consider new sourcing presented here. Daniel (talk) 06:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Tracey[edit]

Ted Tracey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the information in the article is corroborated by the source, the subject fails WP:GNG DirtyHarry991 (talk) 05:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I was hoping to find more... [2] is a mention by another individual. Was hoping Trove from Australia's national library would have something [3], they don't; I wonder if he's too modern to be in there. Oaktree b (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Even in the Wikipedia Library link there isn't much to be found. Oaktree b (talk) 17:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Oaktree b: Did you look at the PapersPast search results? Paora (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    First one's the best, rest are trivial mentions, still not enough to build an article. Oaktree b (talk) 12:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Oaktree b: Tracey was inducted into the New Zealand Speedway Hall of Fame in 2012 [4]. Article here on Tracey from Speedway Racing, November 1984. Paora (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Oaktree b: Here's an article profiling Tracey in the Indianapolis Star of 25 September 1983. Paora (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I've struck my vote, now Neutral. The IndyStar article is good. The other sourcing isn't enough for me to !vote keep but I recognize the WP:POTENTIAL for further offline articles to exist for a subject whose activities far predated mass use of the internet. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  02:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.