Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Cocktail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tech Cocktail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar history The Next Web or Your Story Such sources are being misused to cite abundance of spam on Wikipedia these days. highly misleading and building only promotional content, nothing else. Light2021 (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as corporate spam on an unremarkable event promoter & blatant attempt to WP:INHERIT notability from more notable entities:
  • events organization for startups, entrepreneurs, and technology enthusiasts,[1] co-founded in 2006 by former Tribune Company and AOL employee Frank Gruber and early FeedBurner employee Eric Olson.[2][3]

References

K.e.coffman (talk) 05:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.