Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Dixie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dixie Carter (wrestling)#Dixieland (2013–2014). I've reviewed the relevant SNG and there does not seem to be anything that contradicts the consensus here. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (tc) 13:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Team Dixie[edit]

Team Dixie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short lived stable. Notability is not inherited (WP: INHERITED) by its members. Fails WP: N. StaticVapor message me! 06:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't think the length is so much of an issue. They did run for more than a year; and had a prominant spot on the card during that time (which should imply sourcing). I'll abstain from voting either way, unless someone comes up with a good argument, because how WP:INHERITED fits in with stables has always confused me. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 13:40, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: does not meet WP:NORG; significant RS coverage not found. --K.e.coffman (talk) 05:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: No notability whatsoever; the only thing notable about it is the group's members and their individual success. All of this information can fit in the member's articles seperately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.148.156 (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 01:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.