Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamalpa Runners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tamalpa Runners[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local club fails WP:ORGCRITE Novemberjazz 17:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and California. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lacks references to support notability and quality. - Indefensible (talk) 19:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As stated, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claim to notability, and nothing more I can find but listings. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 13:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I guess. Not finding sources that could support much of an article (which is another way of saying this appears to fail WP:NORG). I get 121 exact-phrase hits on newspapers.com, but none of them seem to have very substantial coverage; at most a sentence here and there. I do a little better on GenealogyBank, where the SF papers have a number of substantial features that relate in some way to Tamalpa Runners, but aren't really about the club and more importantly don't provide much information on it (e.g. this piece on a running camp organized by the club). Both newspapers and Google Books are rich in biographies that touch on the club, like this one, but seldom more than a glancing mention of the org. It's clearly a group of considerable antiquity and significance, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are better sources available somewhere, but we can only work with what we have, and I don't think it's quite enough. -- Visviva (talk) 03:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.