Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TZGZ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TZGZ

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed as a part of new article review/curation process. A combination of no indication of wp:notability and this is a transient programming block on a TV channel. The sources include some commentary on it on web sites but there is no wp:GNG type coverage probably because this is just a temporary self-name for a temporary grouping of programs on a TV channel. . Thanks to the editor for creating this, but I am just trying to do my job properly in taking this to AFD. North8000 (talk) 13:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NTV: The nominator implies that a "programming block on a TV channel" is "transient" and therefore not notable. There is a category of Television programming blocks in the United States, with articles for similar animation blocks like Adult Swim, Cartoon Quest, Toonami and the Disney Afternoon. NTV says that a TV program "is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television channel with a broad regional or national audience." The guideline doesn't exclude "programming blocks" from consideration; it mentions blocks but doesn't distinguish them as far as notability is concerned. The Deadline coverage is reliable and supports notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NTV is not a policy or a guideline. Also even it does not have anything in it regarding notability of programing blocks. A rationale that the provisions for TV shows should be applied to programming blocks because it did not exclude programming blocks makes no logical sense. North8000 (talk) 18:57, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 3/4 of the block is Futurama reruns and other web content; it cannot compare to what was cited above as originating its own programming, and by design because of a certain NBC show on at the same time, it is purposefully designed not to be competitive or attract pop culture attention that would distract ratings on a sister network. Stop crufting the encyclopedia with any time with a special name on television. Nate • (chatter) 02:17, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 14:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as wholly non-notable. --Lockley (talk) 05:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:MILL TV programming, Wikipedia is not a TV guide. Sandstein 17:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable programming block. I ran a web search and came up with several hits from industry web sites but all with the same verbiage - which means that they all copied the same press release. Blue Riband► 02:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.