Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TUFFEM UP Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUFFEM UP Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New record label that has no claims of notability. None of the bands they represent appear to have any claims of notability, and all Google hits appear to be from music downloading sites and blogs. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability; no sig-cov. ╟─Treasury Tag►most serene─╢ 16:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non Deletion' Notability at a company level does not Apply as this is a Entertainment Group "This guideline does not cover small groups of closely related people such as families, entertainment groups, co-authors, and co-inventors covered by WP:Notability (people)." — 16:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Comment This is not an "entertainment group": that would be a band or other such ensemble. This is a record label, which, by definition, is a corporation, whether they choose to call themselves one or not. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Non Deletion~~one !vote per user Label and artists is supported and recognized on Itunes http://itunes.apple.com/au/album/rapid-fire-ep/id405340638 , http://itunes.apple.com/au/album/the-boss-ep/id394765269A Simple Google Search is not enough to be the key judge on the lack of notability. — 16:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarterCronk (talk • contribs)

Comment Define recognition. The mere presence of music on iTunes is meaningless: anyone can post music for sale on iTunes; this does not make the label notable. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is incorrect, music cannot simply be posted on itunes, it needs to be sent to a distribution retailer like www.believedigital.com accounts with companies like these, requires regular releases, and contracts.

The point is, it's trivially easy to get music up on iTunes, if you're willing to pay what's necessary - there's no notability conferred by having it listed there, just as a self-published book gains no notability just because the writer went through the hoops to get it listed on Amazon. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An up and coming new firm that has insufficient operation to date to assert notability. Fails both WP:ORG and WP:PEOPLE. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:18, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unremarkable small record company. No real indications of notability, no significant coverage from reliable third party sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.