Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Systemic vulnerability
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Systemic vulnerability[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Systemic vulnerability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Likely not notable, the listed reference is the only one I can find that has the same use of systemic vulnerability, others refer to "systemic vulnerability" usually in information technology. Love, Cassie. (Talk to me!) 14:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Love, Cassie. (Talk to me!) 14:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I found this [1]. Maybe it helps? Conyo14 (talk) 04:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Relying on a single source is the very definition of original research, for which we have never been the appropriate forum. Bearian (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.