Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supply evangelist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Supply evangelist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This concept does not appear to be notable. The term is not used in the one source cited, and a search does not suggest that the topic has been the subject of significant coverage. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:52, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- some sort of WP:ADVOCACY & a personal essay. Not evident that this concept even exists. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Possibly original research or self-promotion. Definitely not notable. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No RS. Possibly original research. --Hirsutism (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.