Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumin (singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Sonamoo. T. Canens (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sumin (singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NONE of the members of Sonamoo have any notable, individual, solo activities outside of the group. As their activities primarily are within the group, it's best to either delete all the articles or redirect the page names back to Sonamoo. Tibbydibby (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because, like I said, these are members of Sonamoo who are NOT notable outside of the group, and such, I'm bundling the nominations together:

In other words, it is too soon for them to have their own articles at this time. Tibbydibby (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Tibbydibby (talk) 21:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-(weird it won't let me bold the text and I don't feel like looking it up) Anyways delete all. None of the pages showed any form of establishing independent notability and a quick search for them backs that up. They haven't done anything individually that would make a solo page necessary for any of the members. Peachywink (talk) 21:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment- I do want to add that I said delete and not redirect for a reason. These pages have that odd wording of being built by someone that doesn't understand Wikipedia's purpose. Example line from Sumin's biography section "Sumin has a faint resemblance to Hara of KARA when she smiles" -there was of course no source given and all the pages have similar things like this on them. So I feel that if redirected there would be a good chance the pages would just come right back up. Peachywink (talk) 21:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Peachywink: I'll bold your comment in this reply. The way to bold text is to use the single quotation marks three times, before AND after the word. But thanks for your input! Tibbydibby (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all these individuals to Sonamoo as they are plausible search terms and redirects are cheap. I am aware of no evidence that existence of a redirect encourages re-creation of a stand alone article. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/redirect all. None of them are independently notable. Random86 (talk) 05:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all/don't delete As was done with Apink's non-notable members, I feel that it would be more productive to redirect over delete for two reasons:

1.) People interested in Sonamoo's members will go to the main page where they can learn more there instead of being lead down a dead end. 2.) Redirecting these pages will make it easier to recreate them in the possible future occurrence if any of these singers achieve individual notability in the future. Thanks. Inter&anthro (talk) 00:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as unreferenced BLPs. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.