Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street kingz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 10:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Street kingz

Street kingz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Rap group that appears to have only gotten press due to its members' drug-dealing arrests. Notable neither as musicians nor as drug dealers. Fails WP:MUSIC. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 20:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 20:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MUSIC — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiDan61 (talk • contribs) 20:53, November 4, 2008
• Keep Delete One of the articles discusses the role in promotion of the group's music using mix tapes. It also discusses a related controversy over releasing the same tracks after slightly altering them. I'm not a fan. But I don't know why there can't be a brief article on the group and the media coverage they've received. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay. I accept the consensus. Let's push the button. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Per WP:MUSICBIO - no multiple, non trivial WP:RS relating to the band, charted once at #88, not certified gold, no tour, albums not released on major label, musicians not notable individually, not prominent representative of a notable style, no music awards, haven't won a music competition, no performed music for notable film, not on a major radio network, not been the subject of a national TV or radio broadcast. Ergo, not notable as #88 is insignificant and all other criteria fail. IMO. Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 23:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.