Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockland Bay Village (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bateau Bay, New South Wales. One editor asserted that sources exist, but did not provide them; other editors indicated that every source they found failed to meet the "in-depth" requirement. Without specific evidence that there has been coverage, redirecting to the locality (which does currently mention the mall) is appropriate. Should someone actually dig up sufficient sources, it may be recreated then. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stockland Bay Village[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find significant coverage of this shopping centre in multiple, unrelated, reliable sources. [1] Till I Go Home (talk) 01:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have access to the pay site Access World News, and there appears to be significant enough coverage to warrant an article for this regional shopping center. Many of these PPV articles are promotional, but there are a few good ones specifically by the Central Coast Express Advocate dealing with major renovations and local impact on economy. Plus I think when you add in the results of the first nomination, there is enough to justify notability...just most of the sources are past the "pay line". -CrazyHos12 (talk) 02:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where are these sources? You should add them to the article if you asserting notability.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 05:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I conducted a Google search for ("stockland bay village") and went through the first 200 hits. Only one contained coverage that might have been regarded as non-trivial: this article from The Australian. However, I don't think that its coverage was sufficient to be described as "in-depth". A Google News search turned up one hit: Stockland's own website. Fails WP:ORG. Ammodramus (talk) 02:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Der yck C. 12:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete no evidence of in-depth coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 03:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it's been ten days, can an administrator at least close this please? Till I Go Home (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.